Difference between revisions of "Page:ASC 1858 02 02 12-226.pdf/4"

Revision as of 05:53, 7 October 2020

This page has not been proofread

in Solar physics and terrestrial in equation, can do with the great farm to try my method, and inform me if your arrangements would permit of your adding this class of observations to your others; at least for a time. According to my method, the observation, thrice repeated, commonly takes less than 12 minutes, exclusion of a lertal of the forms of the spots, which requires 4 or 5 minutes min, so that coming in the day, and being for articall at any reasmall/re as in all twin of the idells of the day, it would not probably be found very exacting. I should be glad to hear about this from you at your convenience, and will only now add one hint - which might not immediately strike you, namely that if the spots are numerous, or peculiarly situated, it is ouasimally convenient to observe the panayer over the two reis separately and alternately.
Believe me to remain
with great
yours faithfully
R.C. Carrington
To Prof. Secchi

◅

@@ Page body (to be transcluded): / Page body (to be transcluded): @@
@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 [[Category:ASC Letters]]
-in Solar physics and terrestrial in <unclear>equation</unclear>, can do <unclear>with the</unclear> great farm to try my method, and inform me if your arrangements would permit of your adding this class of observations to your others; at least for a time. According to my method, the observation, thrice repeated, <unclear>cirnnuty</unclear> takes less than 12 minutes, exclusion of a
+in Solar physics and terrestrial in <unclear>equation</unclear>, can do <unclear>with the</unclear> great farm to try my method, and inform me if your arrangements would permit of your adding this class of observations to your others; at least for a time. According to my method, the observation, thrice repeated, commonly takes less than 12 minutes, exclusion of a <unclear>lertal</unclear> of the forms of the spots, which requires 4 or 5 minutes min, so that coming in the day, and being for <unclear>articall</unclear> at any <unclear>reasmall/re as in all</unclear> twin of the <unclear>idells</unclear> of the day, it would not probably be found very exacting. I should be glad to hear about this from you at your convenience, and will only now add one hint - which might not immediately strike you, namely that if the spots are numerous, or peculiarly situated, it is <unclear>ouasimally</unclear> convenient to <unclear>observe</unclear> the <unclear>panayer</unclear> over the two <unclear></unclear>reis separately and alternately.<lb/>
+Believe me to remain<lb/>
+with great <unclear></unclear><lb/>
+yours faithfully<lb/>
+R.C. Carrington<lb/>
+To Prof. Secchi