Difference between revisions of "Index:EBC s.d. 0209.pdf"

From GATE
RecipientRecipient
Line 1: Line 1:
[[has uncertain recipient::vicar of Gaeta]]
+
[[has uncertain recipient::Vicar of Gaeta]]
Certain dateCertain date
Line 1: Line 1:
[[has uncertain date::]]
+
unknown
Bibliographic levelBibliographic level
Line 1: Line 1:
 
+
[[has bibliographic level::Typescript]]
RemarksRemarks
Line 3: Line 3:
 
[[Category:EBC Metadata]][[Category:EBC Missing metadata]]
 
[[Category:EBC Metadata]][[Category:EBC Missing metadata]]
 
[[Category:Letters]]
 
[[Category:Letters]]
 +
Given the point of the collection where Tromp places this letter, one could assume that he would have dated it about 1601-1602; anyway nothing in the text points to this assumption, so the date field has been set to 'unknown'. The same applies to the name of the recipient, that it can't be identified without a date. The "vicar" should be the vicar of the bishop of Gaeta.
Transcription pageTranscription page
Line 1: Line 1:
 
+
[[has transcription page::Index:EBC s.d. 0209.pdf]]

Revision as of 15:21, 21 May 2019

◅ Previous letter
Next letter ▻
Title
Author or sender Roberto Bellarmino
Recipient Vicar of Gaeta
Certain date unknown
Place of origin Roma
Place of destination Gaeta
Is followed by
Follows
Language ita
Source
Number of leaves
Dimension
Bibliographic level Typescript
Document type
Graphic apparatus
Published in
Publication page {{{Publication page}}}
Progress  To be validated
Transcription 1
Remarks

Given the point of the collection where Tromp places this letter, one could assume that he would have dated it about 1601-1602; anyway nothing in the text points to this assumption, so the date field has been set to 'unknown'. The same applies to the name of the recipient, that it can't be identified without a date. The "vicar" should be the vicar of the bishop of Gaeta.

Full-text search