Bibliography:AKC Bibliography 0361

From GATE
Revision as of 16:18, 23 November 2017 by Visconti06 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{AKC Bibliography entries |Name(s)=Hirai, Hiro; |Title=''Mysteries of Living Corpuscles: Atomism and the Origin of Life in Sennert, Gassendi and Kircher'' |Year=2016 |Languag...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Hirai, Hiro. Mysteries of Living Corpuscles: Atomism and the Origin of Life in Sennert, Gassendi and Kircher. (2015).

Name(s) Hirai, Hiro
Title Mysteries of Living Corpuscles: Atomism and the Origin of Life in Sennert, Gassendi and Kircher
Place of printing
Printer
Year 2016
Language(s) eng
Contained in Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy
Bibliographic level Book chapter
Catalogue description
Key Concept(s)
Distinction(s)
Keyword(s)
Cited in
Digitization https://www.academia.edu/20292511/ Mysteries of Living Corpuscles Atomism and the Origin of Life in Sennert Gassendi and Kircher in Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy ed. Peter Distelzweig et al. Dordrecht Springer 2016 255-269


Abstract This paper aims to spotlight some important, but neglected, aspects of early modern interactions between matter theories and the life sciences. It will trace the ways in which atomistic or corpuscular modes of reasoning were adopted to explain the origin of life. To that end this paper will examine three seventeenth-century natural philosophers: Daniel Sennert (1572–1637), Pierre Gassendi (1592–1655) and Athanasius Kircher (1602–1680). Through the analysis of their discussions on the minute constitutive parts of living beings (plants, animals and human beings) as living corpuscles, it will inquire into the exchange of ideas among those who advocated “non-mechanist” or “vitalistic” types of corpuscular philosophy (Here I am using the term “vitalistic” broadly construed as the currents that emphasized the role of the life principle or vital principle). This paper’s ultimate goal is to shed light on the role of bio-medical ideas in seventeenth-century natural philosophy. Do you want to read the rest of this chapter?Request full-text