Difference between revisions of "Page:AKC 1665 11 12 555-212.pdf/1"

From GATE
Page body (to be transcluded):Page body (to be transcluded):
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[Category:AKC_Letters]]
 
[[Category:AKC_Letters]]
 
[[Category:AKC_Pages]]
 
[[Category:AKC_Pages]]
? Rdr Pater Redeo in amicitia RV?<lb/>
+
Princeps ab
 +
Admodum Rdr Pater Redeo in amicitia RV?<lb/>
 
in affectu novo, in de veteris pertinaci lenose nil<lb/>
 
in affectu novo, in de veteris pertinaci lenose nil<lb/>
 
intati?, nil silentio deliba tui, sed memoratione? duntaxat<lb/>
 
intati?, nil silentio deliba tui, sed memoratione? duntaxat<lb/>

Revision as of 16:31, 23 June 2025

This page has not been proofread

Princeps ab Admodum Rdr Pater Redeo in amicitia RV?
in affectu novo, in de veteris pertinaci lenose nil
intati?, nil silentio deliba tui, sed memoratione? duntaxat
contacti olim confortudinis nostra, qua' iam
mihi ab annis viginti hoc colui companiis et
animo semper ab fuisse p?tinax? mitt? quo
interea magis ? R V P? in levia in maria
in Cuila denique? ipsi in defendi seretari, idque officin
ut sibi ? humana in plenisque illis abditis una
?ui pulcherrima Philosophici fructu lubens dedicat,
nihil admirari: mihi certe cui aliquando tanti ?
? cruili? elu licet. hoc Caeseficui abvenit, illoque
aCle?, ad huc? p?, quod totus hic vero minui
contextus, cogitationi Puffanus, ad citera illa, ? ?
namque, tua ipsi vel magnitudini vel ?ncelletia vilefiat?:
ne ia in altera ipsa levamque?, aut vestra
illa antea Romana lubeamque, quom altera, p? ilii
qua supra huic, infernon puetia demint, altera vero
qua supra ? huc et facie. hansta ? et haurienda
offendit?. Sed li his folis. Calenu andihinc