Difference between revisions of "Bibliography:AKC Bibliography 0361"
m (ManciniWiki moved page AKC Bibliography 0361 to Bibliography:AKC Bibliography 0361: Text replacement - "AKC Bibliography" to "Bibliography:AKC Bibliography") |
m (Text replacement - "__NOFACTBOX__" to "") |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
{{AKC Bibliography entries | {{AKC Bibliography entries | ||
|Name(s)=Hirai, Hiro; | |Name(s)=Hirai, Hiro; | ||
Latest revision as of 10:17, 9 July 2020
Hirai, Hiro. Mysteries of Living Corpuscles: Atomism and the Origin of Life in Sennert, Gassendi and Kircher. (2015).
| Name(s) | Hirai, Hiro |
|---|---|
| Title | Mysteries of Living Corpuscles: Atomism and the Origin of Life in Sennert, Gassendi and Kircher |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language(s) | eng |
| Contained in | Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy, Peter Distelzweig, BenjaminGoldberg, Evan R. Ragland, (Eds.), Springer, 2015 |
| Bibliographic level | Book chapter |
| Digitization | https://www.academia.edu/20292511/ Mysteries of Living Corpuscles Atomism and the Origin of Life in Sennert Gassendi and Kircher in Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy ed. Peter Distelzweig et al. Dordrecht Springer 2016 255-269 |
Abstract
This paper aims to spotlight some important, but neglected, aspects of early modern interactions between matter theories and the life sciences. It will trace the ways in which atomistic or corpuscular modes of reasoning were adopted to explain the origin of life. To that end this paper will examine three seventeenth-century natural philosophers: Daniel Sennert (1572–1637), Pierre Gassendi (1592–1655) and Athanasius Kircher (1602–1680). Through the analysis of their discussions on the minute constitutive parts of living beings (plants, animals and human beings) as living corpuscles, it will inquire into the exchange of ideas among those who advocated “non-mechanist” or “vitalistic” types of corpuscular philosophy (Here I am using the term “vitalistic” broadly construed as the currents that emphasized the role of the life principle or vital principle). This paper’s ultimate goal is to shed light on the role of bio-medical ideas in seventeenth-century natural philosophy.
