Bibliography:AKC Bibliography 0361 - Revision history

Lorenzo Mancini: Text replacement - "NOFACTBOX" to ""

2020-07-09T09:17:08Z

Text replacement - "__NOFACTBOX__" to ""

ArchivesPUG: /* top */clean up, removed: {{Template:Bibliography_preview}}

2020-02-19T09:24:45Z

top: clean up, removed: {{Template:Bibliography_preview}}

ArchivesPUG: /* Abstract */clean up

2019-10-25T13:04:48Z

Abstract: clean up

Lorenzo Mancini: ManciniWiki moved page AKC Bibliography 0361 to Bibliography:AKC Bibliography 0361: Text replacement - "AKC Bibliography" to "Bibliography:AKC Bibliography"

2018-12-10T09:46:46Z

ManciniWiki moved page AKC Bibliography 0361 to Bibliography:AKC Bibliography 0361: Text replacement - "AKC Bibliography" to "Bibliography:AKC Bibliography"

Lorenzo Mancini: Text replacement - "{{AKC" to "{{Template:Bibliography_preview}} {{AKC"

2018-12-06T11:51:51Z

Text replacement - "{{AKC" to "{{Template:Bibliography_preview}} {{AKC"

Lorenzo Mancini at 15:16, 24 January 2018

2018-01-24T15:16:13Z

Lorenzo Mancini at 10:59, 24 November 2017

2017-11-24T10:59:05Z

Visconti06: Created page with "{{AKC Bibliography entries |Name(s)=Hirai, Hiro; |Title=''Mysteries of Living Corpuscles: Atomism and the Origin of Life in Sennert, Gassendi and Kircher'' |Year=2016 |Languag..."

2017-11-23T15:18:49Z

Created page with "{{AKC Bibliography entries |Name(s)=Hirai, Hiro; |Title=''Mysteries of Living Corpuscles: Atomism and the Origin of Life in Sennert, Gassendi and Kircher'' |Year=2016 |Languag..."

New page

{{AKC Bibliography entries
|Name(s)=Hirai, Hiro;
|Title=''Mysteries of Living Corpuscles: Atomism and the Origin of Life in Sennert, Gassendi and Kircher''
|Year=2016
|Language=eng;
|Contained in=Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy
|Bibliographic level=Book chapter
|Digitization=https://www.academia.edu/20292511/_Mysteries_of_Living_Corpuscles_Atomism_and_the_Origin_of_Life_in_Sennert_Gassendi_and_Kircher_in_Early_Modern_Medicine_and_Natural_Philosophy_ed._Peter_Distelzweig_et_al._Dordrecht_Springer_2016_255-269
}}
Abstract
This paper aims to spotlight some important, but neglected, aspects of early modern interactions between matter theories and the life sciences. It will trace the ways in which atomistic or corpuscular modes of reasoning were adopted to explain the origin of life. To that end this paper will examine three seventeenth-century natural philosophers: Daniel Sennert (1572–1637), Pierre Gassendi (1592–1655) and Athanasius Kircher (1602–1680). Through the analysis of their discussions on the minute constitutive parts of living beings (plants, animals and human beings) as living corpuscles, it will inquire into the exchange of ideas among those who advocated “non-mechanist” or “vitalistic” types of corpuscular philosophy (Here I am using the term “vitalistic” broadly construed as the currents that emphasized the role of the life principle or vital principle). This paper’s ultimate goal is to shed light on the role of bio-medical ideas in seventeenth-century natural philosophy.
Do you want to read the rest of this chapter?Request full-text

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:17, 9 July 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:
	===Abstract===		===Abstract===
	This paper aims to spotlight some important, but neglected, aspects of early modern interactions between matter theories and the life sciences. It will trace the ways in which atomistic or corpuscular modes of reasoning were adopted to explain the origin of life. To that end this paper will examine three seventeenth-century natural philosophers: Daniel Sennert (1572–1637), Pierre Gassendi (1592–1655) and Athanasius Kircher (1602–1680). Through the analysis of their discussions on the minute constitutive parts of living beings (plants, animals and human beings) as living corpuscles, it will inquire into the exchange of ideas among those who advocated “non-mechanist” or “vitalistic” types of corpuscular philosophy (Here I am using the term “vitalistic” broadly construed as the currents that emphasized the role of the life principle or vital principle). This paper’s ultimate goal is to shed light on the role of bio-medical ideas in seventeenth-century natural philosophy.		This paper aims to spotlight some important, but neglected, aspects of early modern interactions between matter theories and the life sciences. It will trace the ways in which atomistic or corpuscular modes of reasoning were adopted to explain the origin of life. To that end this paper will examine three seventeenth-century natural philosophers: Daniel Sennert (1572–1637), Pierre Gassendi (1592–1655) and Athanasius Kircher (1602–1680). Through the analysis of their discussions on the minute constitutive parts of living beings (plants, animals and human beings) as living corpuscles, it will inquire into the exchange of ideas among those who advocated “non-mechanist” or “vitalistic” types of corpuscular philosophy (Here I am using the term “vitalistic” broadly construed as the currents that emphasized the role of the life principle or vital principle). This paper’s ultimate goal is to shed light on the role of bio-medical ideas in seventeenth-century natural philosophy.
−
−	~~__NOFACTBOX__~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:24, 19 February 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~{{Template:Bibliography_preview}}~~
	{{AKC Bibliography entries		{{AKC Bibliography entries
	\|Name(s)=Hirai, Hiro;		\|Name(s)=Hirai, Hiro;

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:04, 25 October 2019
Line 11:		Line 11:
	===Abstract===		===Abstract===
	This paper aims to spotlight some important, but neglected, aspects of early modern interactions between matter theories and the life sciences. It will trace the ways in which atomistic or corpuscular modes of reasoning were adopted to explain the origin of life. To that end this paper will examine three seventeenth-century natural philosophers: Daniel Sennert (1572–1637), Pierre Gassendi (1592–1655) and Athanasius Kircher (1602–1680). Through the analysis of their discussions on the minute constitutive parts of living beings (plants, animals and human beings) as living corpuscles, it will inquire into the exchange of ideas among those who advocated “non-mechanist” or “vitalistic” types of corpuscular philosophy (Here I am using the term “vitalistic” broadly construed as the currents that emphasized the role of the life principle or vital principle). This paper’s ultimate goal is to shed light on the role of bio-medical ideas in seventeenth-century natural philosophy.		This paper aims to spotlight some important, but neglected, aspects of early modern interactions between matter theories and the life sciences. It will trace the ways in which atomistic or corpuscular modes of reasoning were adopted to explain the origin of life. To that end this paper will examine three seventeenth-century natural philosophers: Daniel Sennert (1572–1637), Pierre Gassendi (1592–1655) and Athanasius Kircher (1602–1680). Through the analysis of their discussions on the minute constitutive parts of living beings (plants, animals and human beings) as living corpuscles, it will inquire into the exchange of ideas among those who advocated “non-mechanist” or “vitalistic” types of corpuscular philosophy (Here I am using the term “vitalistic” broadly construed as the currents that emphasized the role of the life principle or vital principle). This paper’s ultimate goal is to shed light on the role of bio-medical ideas in seventeenth-century natural philosophy.
		+
		+	__NOFACTBOX__

← Older revision	Revision as of 09:46, 10 December 2018
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:51, 6 December 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{Template:Bibliography_preview}}
	{{AKC Bibliography entries		{{AKC Bibliography entries
	\|Name(s)=Hirai, Hiro;		\|Name(s)=Hirai, Hiro;

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 |Name(s)=Hirai, Hiro;
 |Title=<i>Mysteries of Living Corpuscles: Atomism and the Origin of Life in Sennert, Gassendi and Kircher</i>
-|Year=2016
+|Year=2015
 |Language=eng;
-|Contained in=Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy
+|Contained in=<i>Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy</i>, Peter Distelzweig, BenjaminGoldberg, Evan R. Ragland,  (Eds.), Springer, 2015
 |Bibliographic level=Book chapter
 |Digitization=https://www.academia.edu/20292511/_Mysteries_of_Living_Corpuscles_Atomism_and_the_Origin_of_Life_in_Sennert_Gassendi_and_Kircher_in_Early_Modern_Medicine_and_Natural_Philosophy_ed._Peter_Distelzweig_et_al._Dordrecht_Springer_2016_255-269
 }}
-==Abstract==
+===Abstract===
 This paper aims to spotlight some important, but neglected, aspects of early modern interactions between matter theories and the life sciences. It will trace the ways in which atomistic or corpuscular modes of reasoning were adopted to explain the origin of life. To that end this paper will examine three seventeenth-century natural philosophers: Daniel Sennert (1572–1637), Pierre Gassendi (1592–1655) and Athanasius Kircher (1602–1680). Through the analysis of their discussions on the minute constitutive parts of living beings (plants, animals and human beings) as living corpuscles, it will inquire into the exchange of ideas among those who advocated “non-mechanist” or “vitalistic” types of corpuscular philosophy (Here I am using the term “vitalistic” broadly construed as the currents that emphasized the role of the life principle or vital principle). This paper’s ultimate goal is to shed light on the role of bio-medical ideas in seventeenth-century natural philosophy.